Skip to main content

From 1932 to 1933 a man-made famine ravaged the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, claiming close to 4 million lives. Today, that famine is known as the Holodomor – “hunger death” or “death by hunger” in Ukrainian. As our awareness of the famine has grown, so have the voices calling for the Holodomor to be acknowledged as genocide perpetrated against the Ukrainian people.

Artist rendition of the famine

A greater international recognition of the Holodomor was recently highlighted on our campus. In commemoration of the 85th anniversary of the famine, the UNC Center for Slavic, Eurasian, and East European Studies hosted an international scholarly conference, titled “New Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Holodomor.” The conference was a collaborative effort between the Center and the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, the Ukrainian Association of North Carolina, and with support from the Holodomor Research and Education Consortium and the Ukrainian Studies Fund. The main organizer, Dr. Oleh Wolowyna (UNC-Chapel Hill), noted that this “was the first scholarly conference focused on the interdisciplinary approach to Holodomor research” and that its goal was to “provide experts from different disciplines the opportunity to share their specific research results and exchange ideas about future interdisciplinary research of the Holodomor.”

Oleh Wolowyna introducing Anne Applebaum’s Skype keynote

Anne Applebaum, Pulitzer-Prize winning historian and journalist, opened the gathering with a Skype keynote that was based on her recent book Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine (Doubleday, 2017). In addition to its interdisciplinary scope, the conference featured a strong international representation – with scholars hailing from Canada, Ukraine, and the United States – all of whom addressed different aspects of the Holodomor as it related to their respective disciplines: history, demography, economics, political science, epidemiology, cartography, psychology, ethnography, and journalism.

Among others, Dr. Nataliia Levchuk (Ukrainian Institute of Demography) and Dr. Oleh Wolowyna (UNC-Chapel Hill) discussed their latest research on exact numbers of famine casualties. Dr. Arturas Rozenas (New York University) showed the lasting effects of the Holodomor on individuals’ political behaviors to the present day, while Dr. H. Lumey (Columbia University) delivered a paper on “Long-Term Impact of Exposure to the Ukraine Famine of 1932-1933 During Gestation on Type 2 Diabetes at Later Age.”

Another goal of the conference was to situate the Holodomor in a context of other man-made famines. To that end, Dr. Sarah Cameron (Univ. of Maryland-College Park) presented on concurrent Kazakh famine of 1930-33 that claimed an estimated 1.5 million lives. Connected with an assault on nomads living in the area, the famine severally altered both population dynamics, leading to the Kazakhs becoming a minority in their own Soviet republic. Dr. Cameron pointed out that the famine in Kazakhstan shared many similarities with the Holodomor, as the regime responses informed each other. Just like in Ukraine, the Soviet authorities closed the borders of the Kazakh republic during the famine. However, in the Kazak case, forced labor camps were also created and disease played a much higher role in the casualties than in Ukraine.

The conference concluded with a roundtable focusing on future steps in interdisciplinary research on the Holodomor. Among other suggestions, Dr. George Liber (University of Alabama at Birmingham) stressed the need for more information on the party activists who enacted collectivization during this time in Soviet Ukraine, stating that we need to identify if these people were volunteers or conscripted, outsiders or locals, Russians or Ukrainians. Dr. Natalya Naumenko (Brown University) discussed the importance of publishing in peer reviewed journals and in English, bemoaning the fact that studies published solely in Ukrainian can lead to their marginalization from the wider scholarly community.

Oleh Wolowyna (UNC-Chapel Hill), who led the roundtable discussion, put forth several suggestions for the future. He called both for new research on the famine to proceed in a comparative fashion looking at concurrent famines in Russia and Kazakhstan, as well as stating the importance of turning to the local archives for materials that lay there waiting to be unearthed and contextualized in the existing literature on and studies of the Holodomor.

– Albert Cavallaro
(MA Student in Global Studies/REEES Track)

Comments are closed.